".creepy voice overs." This wording is unfitting of an encyclopedia.".based on their level of patience for its complex strategic gameplay." I don't think it's suitable to say this at all unless quoted.".divided critics, who generally applauded or jeered the game" "Jeered" kind of has a negative connotation to it, as far as I know.".the game's innovative strategic gameplay".".on closer examination is a complex and engrossing strategy game.". ![]() If a game gets positive reviews, we have to report that it got positive reviews to do otherwise would be being biased.- Martin IIIa ( talk) 22:04, 16 October 2017 (UTC) Reply Martin IIIa: I agree with that statement, but there are several cases where there is unquoted praise of the game, for example: Verified Cactus ( talk) 23:50, 6 September 2016 (UTC) Reply VerifiedCactus - Your accusation of bias doesn't make sense. We're supposed to keep articles as neutral as possible. In regards to the "Reception" section, it appears to be biased in favour of the game, using terms such as "intelligent" to describe it. ![]() We're here to provide a concise and simple plot summary of the game, not inform the readers everything about Genestealers and the WH40K universe. The game summary is written like it's on the back of a video game's box, or an article on the Warhammer Wikia.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |